Publications
(Lab members and other trainees in bold)
Carter, R.N., C.R. Romanow, S.M. Pellis, and S. Lingle. Play for prey: do deer fawns play to develop species-typical antipredator tactics or to prepare for the unexpected? Animal Behaviour (accepted June 2019).
Airst, J., and S. Lingle. 2019. Courtship strategies of white-tailed deer and mule deer when living in sympatry. Behaviour 156: DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003543
Lingle, S. 2019. Embracing the biological. roots of the infant's cry. Parenting: Science and Practice, 19: 56-58.
Bonar, M., M. Manseau, J. Geisheimer, T. Bannatyne and S. Lingle. 2016. The effect of terrain and female density on survival of neonatal white-tailed and mule deer fawns. Ecology and Evolution, 6:4387-4402.
Lingle, S., Riede, T. 2014. Deer mothers are sensitive to infant distress vocalizations of diverse mammalian species. American Naturalist, 184: 510-522. (Supplementary material: Appendix A (plus audio and video on-line); Appendix B).
Teichroeb, L.J., Riede, T., Kotrba, R., Lingle, S. 2013. Fundamental frequency is key to the response of female deer to juvenile distress calls. Behavioural Processes, 92:15-23. (Supplementary material: acoustic data)
Lingle, S., Wyman, M.T., Kotrba, R., Teichroeb, L.J., Romanow, C.A. 2012. What makes a cry a cry? A review of infant distress vocalizations. Current Zoology, 58, 698-726 (Invited paper for special issue on vertebrate social communication.)
Riede, T., Lingle, S., Hunter, E.J. Titze, I.R. 2009. Cervids with different vocal behavior demonstrate different viscoelastic properties of their vocal folds. Journal of Morphology 271, 1-11.
Lingle, S., Feldman, A., Boyce, M.S., Wilson, W.F. 2008. Prey behavior, age-dependent vulnerability and predation rates. American Naturalist 172, 712-725. (Supplementary material)
Lingle, S., Rendall, D., Pellis, S.M. 2007a. Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 1. Species and individual variation in fawn distress calls. Animal Behaviour 73, 897-905.
Lingle, S., Rendall, D., Wilson, W.F., DeYoung, R.W. & Pellis, S.M. 2007b. Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 2. Why mule deer help non-offspring fawns. Animal Behaviour 73, 907-916.
Lingle, S. 2006. Prey defenses: what, why and how? Review of Caro, T.M. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals, University of Chicago Press. Ecology 87, 2405-2406. [Invited Book Review]
Lingle, S., Pellis, S.M., Wilson, W.F. 2005. Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns to coyote predation early in life. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 1140-1149. (AB Ingenuity, SL)
Lingle, S. 2003. Group composition and cohesion in sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 1119-1130.
Lingle, S. 2002. Coyote predation and habitat segregation of white-tailed deer and mule deer. Ecology 83, 2037-2048.
Lingle, S., Pellis, S.M. 2002. Fight or flight? Antipredator behavior and escalation of coyote encounters with deer. Oecologia 131, 154-164.
Lingle, S. 2001. Antipredator strategies and grouping patterns in white-tailed deer and mule deer. Ethology 107, 295-314.
Lingle, S., Wilson, W.F. 2001. Detection and avoidance of predators in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (O. hemionus). Ethology 107, 125-147.
Lingle, S. 2000. Seasonal variation in coyote feeding behaviour and mortality of white-tailed deer and mule deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 85-99.
Lingle, S. 1993. Escape gaits of white-tailed deer, mule deer and their hybrids: body configuration, biomechanics and function. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 708-724.
Lingle, S. 1992. Escape gaits of white-tailed deer, mule deer and their hybrids: gaits observed and patterns of limb coordination. Behaviour 122, 153-181.
Carter, R.N., C.R. Romanow, S.M. Pellis, and S. Lingle. Play for prey: do deer fawns play to develop species-typical antipredator tactics or to prepare for the unexpected? Animal Behaviour (accepted June 2019).
Airst, J., and S. Lingle. 2019. Courtship strategies of white-tailed deer and mule deer when living in sympatry. Behaviour 156: DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003543
Lingle, S. 2019. Embracing the biological. roots of the infant's cry. Parenting: Science and Practice, 19: 56-58.
Bonar, M., M. Manseau, J. Geisheimer, T. Bannatyne and S. Lingle. 2016. The effect of terrain and female density on survival of neonatal white-tailed and mule deer fawns. Ecology and Evolution, 6:4387-4402.
Lingle, S., Riede, T. 2014. Deer mothers are sensitive to infant distress vocalizations of diverse mammalian species. American Naturalist, 184: 510-522. (Supplementary material: Appendix A (plus audio and video on-line); Appendix B).
Teichroeb, L.J., Riede, T., Kotrba, R., Lingle, S. 2013. Fundamental frequency is key to the response of female deer to juvenile distress calls. Behavioural Processes, 92:15-23. (Supplementary material: acoustic data)
Lingle, S., Wyman, M.T., Kotrba, R., Teichroeb, L.J., Romanow, C.A. 2012. What makes a cry a cry? A review of infant distress vocalizations. Current Zoology, 58, 698-726 (Invited paper for special issue on vertebrate social communication.)
Riede, T., Lingle, S., Hunter, E.J. Titze, I.R. 2009. Cervids with different vocal behavior demonstrate different viscoelastic properties of their vocal folds. Journal of Morphology 271, 1-11.
Lingle, S., Feldman, A., Boyce, M.S., Wilson, W.F. 2008. Prey behavior, age-dependent vulnerability and predation rates. American Naturalist 172, 712-725. (Supplementary material)
Lingle, S., Rendall, D., Pellis, S.M. 2007a. Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 1. Species and individual variation in fawn distress calls. Animal Behaviour 73, 897-905.
Lingle, S., Rendall, D., Wilson, W.F., DeYoung, R.W. & Pellis, S.M. 2007b. Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 2. Why mule deer help non-offspring fawns. Animal Behaviour 73, 907-916.
Lingle, S. 2006. Prey defenses: what, why and how? Review of Caro, T.M. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals, University of Chicago Press. Ecology 87, 2405-2406. [Invited Book Review]
Lingle, S., Pellis, S.M., Wilson, W.F. 2005. Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns to coyote predation early in life. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 1140-1149. (AB Ingenuity, SL)
Lingle, S. 2003. Group composition and cohesion in sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 1119-1130.
Lingle, S. 2002. Coyote predation and habitat segregation of white-tailed deer and mule deer. Ecology 83, 2037-2048.
Lingle, S., Pellis, S.M. 2002. Fight or flight? Antipredator behavior and escalation of coyote encounters with deer. Oecologia 131, 154-164.
Lingle, S. 2001. Antipredator strategies and grouping patterns in white-tailed deer and mule deer. Ethology 107, 295-314.
Lingle, S., Wilson, W.F. 2001. Detection and avoidance of predators in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (O. hemionus). Ethology 107, 125-147.
Lingle, S. 2000. Seasonal variation in coyote feeding behaviour and mortality of white-tailed deer and mule deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 85-99.
Lingle, S. 1993. Escape gaits of white-tailed deer, mule deer and their hybrids: body configuration, biomechanics and function. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 708-724.
Lingle, S. 1992. Escape gaits of white-tailed deer, mule deer and their hybrids: gaits observed and patterns of limb coordination. Behaviour 122, 153-181.
